🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.